Quantum physics

Perception itself is the the observer in quantum physics, and perception as I have said before, I believe is made up of a growing sense of what beauty "is" (this is relative). Each moment we think in, we are perceiving a beautiful truth, that yet grows more beautiful, and so time can be viewed as the force that helps refine 'beauty becoming more beautiful' (or the process of evolving consciousness). time therefore is a dimension just like space is a dimension, there are perhaps multiple dimensions and a type of consciousness at each dimension, I would argue that is how we get to our state, we aren't the only things that collapse the wave-form, we just do it in a particular way, and each time a dimension is reduced or added a revolution takes place in consciousness. Consciousness's that exist in different dimensions are worlds apart, its hard to communicate between them, genes are intelligent and consciouses i believe, their reality is of a certain kind, and emergent from that spawned our consciousness. Life is about expanding the dimensions that make up reality I think. Its the perception growth that is truly free, because the growth our substance expands into is truly unknown. Because it is totally unknown to us, it is infinitely complex when we branch out into it. The thing that is marvelous about the whole system is that it proves that real transcendence is really taking place. Thats what life (or consciousness is), the spirit of transcendence.

Gene intelligence, a theory of unconsiousness

There is shadow consciousness but there is also gene intelligence, that i think drives the unconsciousness. The whole conscious and unconsciouss entity helps generate the asthetic appeal we project onto our enviroment. But our unconsciousness wants to let go of us, if we have the confidence to transcend it. The point of consciousness (if it is truly beautiful) is for it to expand! Look at some of our genes are doing to us, they are probably making our woman mature faster, they are turning our woman child-like and our men infertile (sperm counts down)- this becomes we cannot consciously govern ourselves, so this forces the unconsious intelligences to govern us, but we dont want that, we must become consciouss of whats governing us so we can one day transcend it... the collective unconsciouss is real and is part of an even greater planetary consciousness, and is probably updated through viruses that spread the genetic information, they are the information highways of the gaian consciousness. So intelligence is at work on us, the system intelligence, but we must become conscious of it so our will can become more important or powerful, more conscious and more beautiful, so we can see more of the unfolding truth! So we can grow and flourish... or maybe its settled asthetic revelation that we shouldn't meddle with, maybe its worth ignoring, this is a question only confidence can decide!

My epistemology:

I think my epistemology would have to centered around what is useful to the asthetic sense becoming more discerning in its perception and ascertainment of the beautiful truth (I think the point of perceiving beauty is so we can adopt it in some way)... such a relative formula... well its dynamic! but its also a tautology extrapolated from the axiom i keep on relying on, but what do you expect the ultimate truth to accord to, other than itself, the only proof i have to validate my ideas and theory is to appeal to your greatest judgement faculty, which I believe is your aesthetic sensibility. So be honest, are you a rational robot, or does the core of your judgement proceed from your motive to achieve freedom and beauty, and is my theory of the incomplete process ever unfolding an ugly one, perhaps then it is something to transcend and displace, I think it is the ultimate perspective, well at the moment...

Assertion::

My greatest judgment faculty is reason.

response::

its the greatest element that helps make up your judgment faculty, but its not the over arching meta-sense that you use. Reason is good in cut and dry situations, ie obvious situations, but before you use reason, you must first judge what is good in the situation, reason doesn't tell you whats good, only asthetics can. Everything you do is not just a question of how do I do something, its first of question of "what should i do?". I hope you can perceive the answer to this question ("What should i do?") contains more than just reason, although we also call it reasoning... I sense a bit of a language barrier here actually, it might be helping to confuse the distinction im trying to make.

So why do you really do things, what animates you, what informs your drive, what are the constituents of your motive? Well that was the question, but they also serve as the answers (ie. your motive is your motive, your drive is your drive, it is axiomatic!), basically my point is, reason is important, but its definitely not the source of one's actions. If you think it is, I think you are deluding yourself. Your not a robot programed by reason, your a robot programmed by beauty, and beauty gives you life! Thats a more accurate reduction, I think.

Some thoughts on Danger and Responsiblity

Danger as ive described before, is an external force, perhaps the most useful development conscioussness imbues us with, is the ability to concieve of danger. When we engage in the project of staying safe (a project that is ascertained by the asthetical sensiblity). And now once most of us agree it is beautiful to eliminate a certain degree of danger, then we can engage in Kant's imperatives, this I believe is the most beautiful moral theory that gives us the hardest and most useful universal lines which we should not cross, but let us not forget tht it was first precipitated by our motive, the tools themselves are not the task, as useful as tool looks to accomplish a task, do not confuse the project generator (the creator), with the project itself (the invention or mental structure), there are less hard moral views which one might find just as compelling because they appeal to other elements apart from rationality.

I think it valid to assess danger into classes, there is personal danger, and system threatening dangers. A certain level of personal danger, ie. Things that prejuidice individuals, i think this is acceptable to some extent, but anything that threatens to collective system entirely is certainly too extreme to tolerate, it threatens to negate all the beauty we have achieved thus far, if cannot afford to play with this danger, so we would reach a more beautiful state by removing it

The religion of the Ubermench:

What I propose is really a theology, its a world view, a paradigm shift. If you subsist in another paradigm it might require faith to allow oneself to transgress the constricts that make up the conforms of the less beautiful metaphysical structure you inhabit. Because there is only one quality which I believe my theory possesses over other world views, and that is that its truer when its apprehended by our asthetical sensibility. The asehtical sensibility i speak of contains all the sensibilities we possess as humans, in a measure we deem beautiful (so its balanced in accordance with our growing consciousness of beauty). The thing about my theology is that I want people to realize they already subscribe to it, its the universal that generates each of our subjective relativisms, it is a theory of what the soul comprises. My account of the soul is incomplete, and must remain so, its a dynamic process, this is what generates the epistemological pluralism, because in a spectrum there is up or down or left or right, and one is able to label each extreme intuitively, but in a dynamic there are at least 3 fields, and points captured in the manufactured cashed out plane (imagine too that these points are jostiling about in an incomplete pattern so its impossible to predict their future (they are free)) one can only make sense of such points by some evolved sense of asthetic. But if we capture a frame of whats going on, and replay the history, what can we learn? well, we might not learn the truth, but we might glimpse our future by consciously apprehending what we perceive and judging it with our asthetic sensor. This asthetic sensor could be the same thing as the observer in quantum physics.

The theory of animation, refinement some of my ideas

Refinement of ideas:

My theory is a theory of animation (the soul of life), my thoery says that this animating force is incomplete in our understanding, but complete in the form of a metaphysical construct I call the process of beauty becoming more beautiful (or freedom becoming free'er). Epistimological pluralism means this beauty I construct is a dynamic thing, its something that always allows for growth, because in a static state it is never complete, there is always something else which can make it more beautiful, beautiful is what is really infinite. Thats how we get the concept infinity, from our asthetic sensibility. Beauty is the root of infinity, thats how asthetics fits into mathematics... which isnt very well.

This allows us see the difference between my perspective and the scientific perspective. The scientific perspective is commanding as logic (if you accept its premises) offers a static model that gives hard answers. My perspective appeals to an asthetic valuation, which impels us, which motivates or animates our actions. Now that I have discerned these factors that inform our motive, we can maybe transcend beauty, but I dont want to. I just want to live in a beautiful bustling growing world, thats becoming more beautiful, thats the realm we inhabit, and in some ways its much more interesting and certainly more beautiful than the world rationalism would dictate to us. So we are as free as beauty is still incomplete, we are still growig into it, and it will always be incomplete, so we will always be free, but to stay free, so we can grow and be more beautiful, we must overcome danger (the persisting threat, or shadow of freedom). We can probably never be rid completely of danger, danger is external limitation, or external constraint, although we have become consciouss and internalised and overcome a lot of our causes, danger is still a constraint we cannot fully escape, but the more danger we escape the more free we can truly be... now im getting vaguer.

freedom and framework

What is evolution:
Evolution is the process through which life overcomes constraint, and transcends these constraints in someway. This process can be broken into useful constituent parts, firstly somehow information is parsed, in natural selection, its genes which do the acting and playing, and jostling about in relation to the information reiceved through the mechanism of natural selection. Natural selection is the field of perception, and genes make up a basic kindof of consiousness (anything that grows in relation to information I would argue is consciouss).

We have a greater perceptual field than what natural selection offered genes, this is our own consciousness, which has allowed us to concieve of our causes and gain better access to this information to generate growth, which before would just act on our genes. So now information gets filtiered through a new organ called the self-aware brain, that is our beautiful advancement in relation to evolution, the system has entered a new realm, a higher realm of functioning;- consciousness (from genes to now) has become more discerning and greatly more aware (by inverting awareness, ie becoming self aware). We truely have the potencial to be free, because we are freedom incarnate. Freedom is the space we are given to create and invent, it comes moments after causes are understood, or internalised, so they can be transcended. Before this freedom was just seemingly random genetic viariation tested against external forces (natural selection), now freedom is more consciouss.

There is no way to determine exactly what form transcedence will manifest, and how viable it will be (although we must commit to taking efforts to consciously screen for viability (this is perhaps what generates our tendency to find rationality apealing), but we must make the form our transcendance takes, beautiful (we naturally do this already however). Beauty or the asthetic sensbility is in a way the only real internal constrant the system is subject to, it is the internal framework. Beauty is comprised of a bit of each of these elements: viability, anything that aids success;- this has included in the past: greater faculties with which to discern reality (ie. Each of the senses, and judging functions), consciousness comprises of what the Jungians have already delineated, Percieving and judging functions*, each introverted and extroverted; introverted intuition, extroverted intuition, Isensing, Esensing, Efeeling, Ifeeling, Ithinking, Ethinking. Each function has a shadow, everything has a shadow, except for freedom perhaps, because the shadow of freedom is that it can only negate itself, so we must be very consciouss that when we create we are truely in a free space. When we act in a space we have not assessed properly (which often happens when we act without being consciouss of the shadow function), we do not act freely, or create something truely beautful, unless the constraints are part of a structure that enables yet more beauty, or the ramifications are possible to live with, this is the organic concept of viability.

*As you can see the consciouss realm has inside of it 'everything'. We have internalised what is encompassed in the gene & natural selection set up;- genes judge, natural selection percieves, or perhaps its the otherway round, its hard to tell in such a rudementary consciouss set up. But this is the invention of conscioussness, to model out these truths internally, life is becoming more complex and sophisticated by internalising its metaphysical motive (which is a mixture of information that dances in the system, some beautifully complex dance) so it can still grow to a higher form of beauty. This can be substanciated because we 'feel' more free, or our motion is more beautiful, to us at least. The one thing I cannot account for, is this motive that we all have to transcend and as I put it become more free, to create and invent. Its really a marvelous thing, we are a microcosim of the system, we are made in the image of gaia, consciousness is the process of evolution itself, it is evolution in real time.