The religion of the Ubermench:

What I propose is really a theology, its a world view, a paradigm shift. If you subsist in another paradigm it might require faith to allow oneself to transgress the constricts that make up the conforms of the less beautiful metaphysical structure you inhabit. Because there is only one quality which I believe my theory possesses over other world views, and that is that its truer when its apprehended by our asthetical sensibility. The asehtical sensibility i speak of contains all the sensibilities we possess as humans, in a measure we deem beautiful (so its balanced in accordance with our growing consciousness of beauty). The thing about my theology is that I want people to realize they already subscribe to it, its the universal that generates each of our subjective relativisms, it is a theory of what the soul comprises. My account of the soul is incomplete, and must remain so, its a dynamic process, this is what generates the epistemological pluralism, because in a spectrum there is up or down or left or right, and one is able to label each extreme intuitively, but in a dynamic there are at least 3 fields, and points captured in the manufactured cashed out plane (imagine too that these points are jostiling about in an incomplete pattern so its impossible to predict their future (they are free)) one can only make sense of such points by some evolved sense of asthetic. But if we capture a frame of whats going on, and replay the history, what can we learn? well, we might not learn the truth, but we might glimpse our future by consciously apprehending what we perceive and judging it with our asthetic sensor. This asthetic sensor could be the same thing as the observer in quantum physics.